Do you believe the terms “manager” and “leader” mean the same? Actually, that is not entirely right. It is quite confusing as both are related to each other. These two terms are often used interchangeably in the corporate community, but there are many distinctions between management skills and leadership skills.
So, what really is this enigmatic distinction? We’re going to break it all down for you right now.
To add to the confusion, the most productive leaders may have much of the same qualities as good managers and vice versa. Those lines do get more frustratingly fuzzy at times.
If that is the case, what distinguishes a better leader from a great manager?
The most important thing is their attitudes and interactions; strong leaders encourage others to emulate them and live up to the example they set. Managers, on the other hand, are put in places of authority on the corporate or organizational chart, which means subordinates feel obligated to defer to them merely because they are outranked.
Is this to say that a manager cannot even be a good leader? There is a lot of crossovers, so no. But, just to be clear, let’s shed some light on some of the qualities that will help us differentiate between a manager and a leader.
Though managers are in charge of their teams‘ day-to-day activities, executives are more concerned with policy and shaping the general course of the culture, agency, or whole enterprise.
With this in mind, leaders must have the foresight and big-picture thinking skills to guide the ship while the manager instructs the team.
The strongest leaders aren’t satisfied with the status quo. Instead, they want to test certain conventions and solve challenges with a creative approach or a whole new viewpoint. They are born innovators.
As a result, leaders are naturally inquisitive. They enjoy learning, growing, and being closely acquainted with how things work—and how they could work better.
Communication is one of the most necessary skills on the management list. It is important for both leaders and management alike. Their contact mechanisms and material, however, can vary.
Although managers must be able to articulate directives and suggestions, leaders place less emphasis on technical aspects and more emphasis on inspiration and empowerment.
Leaders must have a high degree of personal maturity in order to encourage people to join them rather than instructing them to obey.
This ensures they will empathize with others, build relationships and sincere relations with them, and then inspire them accordingly.
Lastly, the most successful leaders are kept to high standards of accountability. They see themselves as accountable not only to themselves but also to those who look up to them.
Leaders should not see direct reports as burdens that can jeopardize their own credibility. Instead, they see such reports as individuals to which they must provide proper service and assistance. Whereas, managers believe that his or her team members are accountable for what they themselves do.
So, yes, there is a difference between both of them.
Management Skills vs Leadership Skills
It may appear that distinguishing between management and leadership skills is a trick issue. Isn’t it true that both managers are also leaders? Although many would say that managers should have leadership qualities to be successful, this isn’t always the case.
Many organizations have failed to cultivate and educate this category, allowing the majority to forge their path to their distinct management or leadership style.
The most successful companies understand that continuity is the key to long-term growth. Simultaneously, there has been much discussion about methodologies, whether to learn or develop; whether to feed or evolve.
The key definition that distinguishes management and leadership skills are:
- Management Skills: The ability to handle staff and money in order to provide a good or service.
- Leadership Skills: The ability to engage others and inspire them to ‘buy in’ to a vision or objective.
You may get one without the other, but it comes at a price. In a system of obedience and conformity, management without leadership would suffice. Leadership without management may result in unpredictable behavior.
True usefulness emerges from a careful balance between the two. Overall progress is achieved by developing individuals at the same rate as the organization; developing people entails developing both those who run the organization and those who deliver in it.
A business will only expand if the people who work in it grow. Management is more concerned with procedure, while leadership is mainly concerned with individuals and mindset.
Management skills and expertise are important and can be learned. Whereas, Leadership is influenced by personality and experience. As a result, you learn management skills and improve leadership skills.
To be a successful leader or manager, you must possess a wide range of skills. In a perfect universe, there would be a lot of variation between the two.
However, one thing is certain: being a good leader or manager does not happen by chance. As in something, to possess leadership skills or management skills it is necessary to be self-aware as well as invest yourself in bettering your skillsets.
Where do you begin to improve your skillset? Do not worry Skillz4Life is here to guide you…
If there is anything you would like to share or ask, do comment below.